Copy Content: The Ultimate Guide for Finding and Fixing Duplicate Content for Improved SEO

Copy content: the definitive guide to find and correct duplicate content to improve SEO

Copying substance is terrible. The use of a similar substance, whether a total or incomplete structure, generates a bad customer experience on your site and triggers a warning in the calculation of Google queries. In the days of SEO, the copy substance was regularly used as a shameful move to get more keywords and progressive content on your site, so Google developed a framework to eliminate spammers who damaged the accepted procedures when doing this. Today, in case you are discovered using copy content, your expert in the area could endure and your keyword ranking could fall.

Fortunately, Google is really reasonable on the subject. The organization understands that most problems with copy substances do not come to fruition as a pernicious effort to build an efficient range. In reality, most of the occasions of the substance of the copy are setbacks or are neglected by the administrators of the website. After all, having an excess of content reviewed on your site can be detrimental, and it is a great advantage to conduct a test to verify if there is any duplication on your site.

Chapter List

+ Introduction - Defined duplicate content

+ How Google penalizes duplicate content

+ Syndication: Duplicate content in all domains

+ Duplicate content in the same domain

+ How to find and correct duplicate content

+ Conclusion


Since I started getting wet in SEO, this research has revolved around discussions and websites. Somewhere, someone who might be listening argued that having a similar substance on page A of your site such as page B of your site would cause your site to be punished in Internet search engine rankings. This thought began to permeate the web display network because many spammers understood that when they had some substance (that is, an article) that was receiving a large amount of query traffic, they could complete each page of their site with a similar substance to force considerably more traffic from web crawlers. Clearly, a similar article copied directly to several pages within a lonely area is a vengeful effort to collect web crawler traffic without actually including any value. Google began using this technique in a short time and corrected its calculations to identify the substance of the copy and show a single version of it in the ranking of queries. The sites that dealt with this direct action were messed up and shouted cross-sectionally in online meetings and magazines through the web display network. Subsequently, the fear of "punishment of copy content" was brought to the world.

In any case, in most cases, the copy substance is not vindictive and is essentially the result of any CMS (content management framework) in which the site continues to operate. For example, WordPress (the industry standard CMS) accordingly creates "Class" and "tag" pages that summarize all blog posts within specific ratings or tags. This creates numerous URLs within the area that contain a similar substance.

1) Google may choose to give me the opportunity to leave with a "notice" and simply decide not to archive 99 of my 100 copy publications, but keep one of them registered. NOTE: This does not mean that the hunting rankings of my site will be influenced in any way.

2) Google can choose to be such a blatant effort in the framework of the game that it completely removes my entire site from all the query elements. This implies, regardless of whether you legitimately scanned for "", Google would not discover any results.

Therefore, one of these two situations is guaranteed to occur. Which is based depends on how horrible Google decides your botch is. In Google's own words:

Copying content on a site is not justification for the activity on that site, except if it creates the impression that the purpose of the copy substance is to be complicated and to control the results of the web search tool. In the event that your site experiences substance copy problems, and does not follow the exhortation recorded above, we work admirably to choose a version of the substance that appears in the elements of our list.

This type of non-pernicious duplication is genuinely normal, especially since many CMS do not treat this normally. So, when people claim that having this type of copy substance can influence your website, it is not for the reason that

Post a Comment